A shady history of reselling has nothing to with a DMCA takedown. A DMCA takedown notice that says nothing about copyrights is a nonsensical action to take to p

A shady history of reselling has nothing to with a DMCA takedown. A DMCA takedown notice that says nothing about copyrights is a nonsensical action to take to protect copyrights. Further, if this random internet person's conjecture was correct, the takedown notice would be for the images and not the article itself. That is, it can never legitimately be a way for them to 'have the article pulled.' Yes, doing something completely incorrect is easier than hiring an expert. But GoPro isn't exactly a mom and pop shop these days, do you think they use this same 'this was easier' philosophy on reporting taxes?