4 ms·
I see how you got here, but that's not what I'm arguing. The parent's post seems to imply that anyone that would react strongly to a joke is a "colossal fucking
by paranoiacblack 14y ago
I see how you got here, but that's not what I'm arguing. The parent's post seems to imply that anyone that would react strongly to a joke is a "colossal fucking idiot." This seems to imply that the joke's content has no relation to the reaction. So I was just wondering if that really holds. As per the parent's reply, it does. I'm not even barely implying that threatening to kill political figures is the next logical step. I'm implying that there definitely is some hard limit being ignored or maybe I'm wrong.
- marshray 14y agoYeah I dunno. I get your point about relating the offense and the action. Maybe try rephrasing your argument with a less "charged" example? Aside: Does anybody know the actual joke in question? More than it just referencing a "big dongle".