3 ms·
Given how long it takes pdflatex to compile relatively simple files, I’m rather happy with HTML – and throwing out all the logic that makes pdflatex take ages w
by claudius 14y ago
Given how long it takes pdflatex to compile relatively simple files, I’m rather happy with HTML – and throwing out all the logic that makes pdflatex take ages would throw away all the beauty of ‘LaTeX’.
Admittedly, though, there are a few things I miss in HTML, \footnote (placed at the end of the paragraph or so maybe?) being the most prominent one.
- johndcook 14y agoI don't know what about LaTeX makes it slower than TeX to compile. I always use LaTeX rather than TeX so I'm used to the former's speed. So recently when I compiled a huge TeX document, I assumed the compile had failed because it returned so quickly -- it seemed to return immediately -- but it completed successfully.
- claudius 14y agoI have no experience with TeX ./. LaTeX, but one idea would be that LaTeX is simply not seen as performance-critical – whether your huge report takes two seconds or thirty seconds to compile is rather irrelevant if you do that once or twice a day. TeX being some sort of subset of LaTeX might simply make it faster due to a lack of features. On the other hand, people spend ages trying to optimise HTML.