6 ms·

The company she works for is SendGrid, if random redditors discussing this are to be trusted.

by thrwawayaccnt 14y ago

rdtsc 14y ago
Alright thanks.
- rdtsc 14y ago
  Ok it seems SendGrid might be the company that Adria works for not the company that fired the guy. Guy's company is PlayHeaven. If I see either one of their companies' booths I will make sure to have 'a nice' chat with them.
  - pseudosmith 14y ago
    Why don't you get all the facts before making a jackass out of yourself. I see yu have at least realized that SendGrid was not HIS employer before you, too tuned into "Joan of Arc". The SendGrid CEO terminated her quickly and fir the right reasons. So...if you see him in a booth, offer to buy him a beer.
lawnchair_larry 14y ago
That is not what he was asking. SendGrid is not a party to this issue.
- askien 14y ago
  Yes. Sendgrid is a party to this issue. She's a public figure for them and she made use of her public image to shame two people and ultimately causing, at least one of them to lose their job. And she was being a hypocrite, as she made phallic jokes on her twitter account... I hope sendgrid fires her. Either way I'm not using any of their products anymore.
- droithomme 14y ago
  Sure they are to the same extent his employer is since her posse made sure they fired him. She is a horrific bully who has destroyed an innocent person's career to advance her own personal publicity and branding. She's a bad person. I would never hire her or have anything to do with her or anyone who defends her insane, horrific and unethical actions. I also will have nothing to do with PyCon henceforth. They have made their beds. Let them lie in them.
  - horseface 14y ago
    she did not destroy anyone's career; he made an off color comment at a tech conference, someone reported that he did so, and his employer made a decision to fire him because of how it reflected on their company. had he not said it, she'd have nothing to report; had his employer not agreed that it was inconsistent with the public image they wish to present, they would not have fired him.
    - jluster 14y ago
      Actually, not quite factually true. She did not "report" it. She used her significant media presence to shame someone with vague allusions. The right thing to do would have been for his company to get his side of the story (which we see above) and make a public statement, not to fire him over pitchforks and torches at the gates.
    - nilkn 14y ago
      If you're going to base your whole argument just on the actions of the companies involved, I think you'll run into a pickle when you incorporate the fact that she was just fired herself over her actions. Back up your opinion with self-sufficient evidence and justification. It does not suffice to just point at what others have done.
      - timv 14y ago
        > she was just fired herself over her actions. Do you actually know what she was fired over? All I've seen in a statement that her employment was terminated. For all I know the situation went like this: SendGrid: We think you handled this situation badly, and since you were there as a SendGrid employee, that reflects badly on the company. We'd like you to make a public apology about they way in which you dealt with it. Adria: No SG: We're not asking Adria: But I'm not doing it SG: Then we don't think you can continue working here. Which is to say, she may have been terminated because of how she handled the situation within SendGrid, rather than what she did at the Con. Or maybe not. I don't think we've been given enough information to know & nor are we ever likely to unless Adria posts it. Edit: I've just read the more detailed blog post (http://blog.sendgrid.com/a-difficult-situation/ http://blog.sendgrid.com/a-difficult-situation/) and it seems your interpretation is right.
- crozo 14y ago
  Yes they are. The same way the guys were representing their company, she was representing SendGrid at the conference. You can't be an "Evangelist" at a tech conference and pretend your actions don't represent your company as well.

The company she works for is SendGrid, if random redditors discussing this are to be trusted.

rdtsc 14y ago

Alright thanks.

rdtsc 14y ago
Ok it seems SendGrid might be the company that Adria works for not the company that fired the guy. Guy's company is PlayHeaven. If I see either one of their companies' booths I will make sure to have 'a nice' chat with them.
- pseudosmith 14y ago
  Why don't you get all the facts before making a jackass out of yourself. I see yu have at least realized that SendGrid was not HIS employer before you, too tuned into "Joan of Arc". The SendGrid CEO terminated her quickly and fir the right reasons. So...if you see him in a booth, offer to buy him a beer.

lawnchair_larry 14y ago

That is not what he was asking. SendGrid is not a party to this issue.

askien 14y ago
Yes. Sendgrid is a party to this issue. She's a public figure for them and she made use of her public image to shame two people and ultimately causing, at least one of them to lose their job. And she was being a hypocrite, as she made phallic jokes on her twitter account... I hope sendgrid fires her. Either way I'm not using any of their products anymore.
droithomme 14y ago
Sure they are to the same extent his employer is since her posse made sure they fired him. She is a horrific bully who has destroyed an innocent person's career to advance her own personal publicity and branding. She's a bad person. I would never hire her or have anything to do with her or anyone who defends her insane, horrific and unethical actions. I also will have nothing to do with PyCon henceforth. They have made their beds. Let them lie in them.
- horseface 14y ago
  she did not destroy anyone's career; he made an off color comment at a tech conference, someone reported that he did so, and his employer made a decision to fire him because of how it reflected on their company. had he not said it, she'd have nothing to report; had his employer not agreed that it was inconsistent with the public image they wish to present, they would not have fired him.
  - jluster 14y ago
    Actually, not quite factually true. She did not "report" it. She used her significant media presence to shame someone with vague allusions. The right thing to do would have been for his company to get his side of the story (which we see above) and make a public statement, not to fire him over pitchforks and torches at the gates.
  - nilkn 14y ago
    If you're going to base your whole argument just on the actions of the companies involved, I think you'll run into a pickle when you incorporate the fact that she was just fired herself over her actions. Back up your opinion with self-sufficient evidence and justification. It does not suffice to just point at what others have done.
    - timv 14y ago
      > she was just fired herself over her actions. Do you actually know what she was fired over? All I've seen in a statement that her employment was terminated. For all I know the situation went like this: SendGrid: We think you handled this situation badly, and since you were there as a SendGrid employee, that reflects badly on the company. We'd like you to make a public apology about they way in which you dealt with it. Adria: No SG: We're not asking Adria: But I'm not doing it SG: Then we don't think you can continue working here. Which is to say, she may have been terminated because of how she handled the situation within SendGrid, rather than what she did at the Con. Or maybe not. I don't think we've been given enough information to know & nor are we ever likely to unless Adria posts it. Edit: I've just read the more detailed blog post (http://blog.sendgrid.com/a-difficult-situation/ http://blog.sendgrid.com/a-difficult-situation/) and it seems your interpretation is right.
crozo 14y ago
Yes they are. The same way the guys were representing their company, she was representing SendGrid at the conference. You can't be an "Evangelist" at a tech conference and pretend your actions don't represent your company as well.