5 ms·
"an innocent remark can easily be taken the wrong way when it comes after the chain of sexism women deal with in any given day." ...what? How much effort do yo
by uchi 14y ago
"an innocent remark can easily be taken the wrong way when it comes after the chain of sexism women deal with in any given day."
...what? How much effort do you put in to finding everything sexist?
This ladybug mounting another ladybug outside my window? Sexually oppressive. The female ladybug should be capable of choosing which position is preferable for her. This pencil in my hand? It's long. Hence a phallic object. Hence sexually intimidating. I am forced to involuntarily hold penises as I write on paper. This mouse under my palm is being raped as it has no matter of choice by which I guide it and its wheel (symbolic of the empowering clitoris, which I voluntarily scroll with) to accomplish my task. It has no say in when I click it or how I click it. Hence I am depriving it of free choice. Hence I am raping it.
- mkr-hn 14y ago> ...what? How much effort do you put in to finding everything sexist? Less effort than you put in to dragging out absurd strawpeople.
- uchi 14y ago>strawpeople. Are even logical fallacies supposed to be politically correct now? That's hilarious. Googling strawpeople gets me a New Zealand band.
- mkr-hn 14y agoLanguage policing helps your argument a lot.
- uchi 14y agoIn this case it actually does. There's absolutely no need to change strawman to strawpeople, other than the necessary implied injustice that you feel for the fact that the word contains 'man', and therefore must somehow be corrected to contain both sexes. It's a silly changing of nomenclature for no other purpose than to generate a feeling of self congratulatory accomplishment over a wrong that doesn't actually exist, much like the severity of the injustice that you feel is placed upon women in society every day.
- mkr-hn 14y agoI use it because I think it sounds better, not out of whatever you tried to get at in all those screedy words. But you go ahead with your attempt at mind reading.
- uchi 14y agoUsing it because it sounds better can sometimes run contrary with the word and its meaning. In this case being confused with a pretty bitchin' New Zealand band. But let's be honest here, with the sprinkling of select phrases in other posts, we both know exactly what you meant and why you used it.
- mkr-hn 14y agoNo.
- CRConrad 14y agoExactly. Only, it's changing the age-old term strawmen to "strawpeople" that is the language policing here.
- mkr-hn 14y agoI can't police my own language. I chose the word. I have that right.
- CRConrad 14y agoNo, apparently you can't police your own language. But your act of "correcting" strawman to "strawperson" IS an act of "language policing" -- you're policing the language of the person who used "strawman". And it was you yourself who said that language policing proves one wrong. Sure, you do indeed have the right to prove yourself wrong.
- CRConrad 14y agoExactly. Only, it's changing the age-old term strawmen to "strawpeople" that is the language policing here.
- bartl 14y agoThese are not strawpeople. These are sex jokes.
- oh_sigh 14y agoYou might like this Portlandia clip: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ohk-Ey01c9k http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ohk-Ey01c9k