3 ms·
Link to regular Google+, not the obnoxious tiny-text basic one: https://plus.google.com/107429617152575897589/posts/iPmatxBYuj2 https://plus.google.com/10742961
by lucian1900 14y ago
Link to regular Google+, not the obnoxious tiny-text basic one: https://plus.google.com/107429617152575897589/posts/iPmatxBYuj2 https://plus.google.com/107429617152575897589/posts/iPmatxBY...
- suprfsat 14y agoOh good, the one with the obnoxious banner that slides down, and takes three times the RAM to display in my browser. Thank you.
- jrajav 14y agoI actually like it. It's not that readable to begin with, sure, but it's still more content-friendly than the full, overloaded Google+ UI. And unlike the full UI, you can zoom in and/or apply custom CSS (Try Safari's Reader), and it's also friendlier to low-bandwidth, screen readers, etc. I dunno, mostly playing devil's advocate here, but I think Google+ has some issues as a competitor for traditional blogging that this low-tech version highlights.
- pasbesoin 14y agoToo bad the respective URL's don't appear to share common substrings/identifiers.