2 ms·
That they have a valid point is not in question. totally unwarranted If you agree that Jason's point is valid, I don't see how you can think his response was
by JoelSutherland 18y ago
That they have a valid point is not in question.
totally unwarranted
If you agree that Jason's point is valid, I don't see how you can think his response was unwarranted.
Jason did not appear to believe GetSatisfaction simply slipped up. Instead he accused them of extortion! His response was in line with this belief and only unwarranted if you disagree with his point.
- swombat 18y agoThat they have a valid point does not mean that all their points were valid. Valid point: GS wording is bad. Invalid point: GS are evil extortionists. Both can coexist in the same post.
- JoelSutherland 18y agoThat they have a valid point is not in question. Should I have taken that to mean: "That some of the very minor points he made were valid is not in question."? Clearly the takeaway from his post was not that he disagreed with the wording.