4 ms·
(But it's not about his well-being. It's that I don't want him to lose his blog or to stop reviewing. He's such a tremendous writer.)
by unalone 18y ago
(But it's not about his well-being. It's that I don't want him to lose his blog or to stop reviewing. He's such a tremendous writer.)
- Xichekolas 18y agoEbert has the kind of fame that can outlive his company's downfall. He'll just take over his domain name and keep reviewing, and his content will probably continue to be syndicated nationwide. In fact, he might end up making more since he won't have to give the Sun-Times it's share. Just because a company goes under doesn't mean it takes all it's assets with it. The good bits will be bought by someone.