3 ms·
It sounds like maybe that company didn't do the upfront work required to make sure - or at least increase the likelihood - that they were making a good hire in
by RougeFemme 14y ago
It sounds like maybe that company didn't do the upfront work required to make sure - or at least increase the likelihood - that they were making a good hire in the first place. Or maybe they didn't have good employee development in place once the employees are hired. Having said that though, my knee-jerk reaction is to be skeptical of no-hire policies. For the company in the article it seems to work. I'm just skeptical that most companies would have the will/capability to truly make it work.
- chc 14y agoEven a perfect hiring process won't completely eliminate bad employees. Just because someone was good when you hired them doesn't mean they'll continue to be. Maybe your needs change and they are unwilling to cope effectively. Maybe they develop a drug problem. Maybe they burn out. Maybe they just stop caring. Sadly, a good employee is not necessarily good forever.