2 ms·
one flaw on the estimates: it assume 100% of the uses leave the popunder running. anyone have any data on the effectiveness of popunders? this is one area i ne
by gcb0 14y ago
one flaw on the estimates: it assume 100% of the uses leave the popunder running.
anyone have any data on the effectiveness of popunders? this is one area i never have to deal with (thankfully)
- Zimahl 14y agoEffectiveness? Like click-through rate? It's irrelevant in this model, really. The popunder loads the page that loads all of the other ad-clicking domain pages, and since it's a popunder it's probably not noticed until the browser has loaded the entire contents. It's damn brilliant. Paying $3k for low-end $500k? That's a great ROI.
- gcb0 14y agomy point is: how many people even let the popupunder load? i visit a few forums that have popunders for the first sessio n click. it's almost a knee jerk reaction to close the window while i wait for the forum index to load. He is making the assumption that 100% of the visits translates to a popunder being able to do it's thing. I just want to know if the real world the number is 99% or 10%.
- bjourne 14y agoThe described scheme has nothing to do with popunders really. A hidden iframe is loaded in which the advertisers ad is "displayed" and the publisher gets payed on cpm. The user doesn't even get to see the ad.