4 ms·
This is at most an argument for agnosticism, not for theism. To say that with our current state of knowledge we don't know how to explain certain things - or ev
by primelens 14y ago
This is at most an argument for agnosticism, not for theism. To say that with our current state of knowledge we don't know how to explain certain things - or even to say that we cannot know certain things - does not mean that we should grab onto the handiest fairytale as the definitive explanation for said lacuna in our knowledge.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot