4 ms·
There's nothing wrong with saying: "If this bill is bad, let's kill it." The proponents are free to fix it and try again. To answer your question more directly
by declan 14y ago
There's nothing wrong with saying: "If this bill is bad, let's kill it." The proponents are free to fix it and try again.
To answer your question more directly, if privacy law $i or $j or $k interferes with information sharing, then let's identify those privacy laws and have a discussion about how to amend them to allow information sharing in the case of an ACTUAL cyberattack. As anyone who's made a mistake with /bin/rm knows, wildcards can be dangerous and have unintended consequences. I haven't seen this argument answered directly, and I'd like to read a thoughtful response.
More:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-57422693-281/how-cispa-would-affect-you-faq/ http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-57422693-281/how-cispa-wou...
- snowwrestler 14y agoIt just seems to me that if "kill the bill" is the sole entirety of the message, then there is no way to move forward on the issue. Your 2nd paragraph makes a lot of sense, but as far as I know has not been offered or endorsed by any of the opposition groups. If I'm wrong please let me know.