4 ms·
I have no trouble believing that weev did those things and worse, and it is probably criminal behavior, and if so it should be punished. But that has nothing to
by fnordfnordfnord 14y ago
I have no trouble believing that weev did those things and worse, and it is probably criminal behavior, and if so it should be punished. But that has nothing to do with what the gov't. has just done. Just as defense atty's want sympathetic defendants, prosecutors are happy to exploit the unsympathetic response that most people have to learning about weev's behavior. If we let them do it to weev, we are inviting them to do it to anyone, including yourself. The gov't has just expanded its power to jail people for what ought to never have been chargeable, and given that power to companies like AT&T. As it stands now, any company with the means to do so can use the state to jail you under similar circumstances. Even if you are a nice guy who saves stranded kittens from trees.
- nicholassmith 14y agoWell, previous behaviour has everything to do with sentencing. Seriously, they don't just look at the case and go "41 months!", they weigh everything up and go from there. The likelihood is a security researcher with a spotless past wouldn't have gone through it, prosecution would have pushed for a hard sentence of course but the final judgement takes into account everything. Basically, the prosecution wanted a harsh sentence to set precedent and weev gave them the ammo to do it.