"Do not confuse the copyrightability of ideas with the copyrightability of an expression." I'm pretty sure I wasn't doing that, but I don't think you read my c

"Do not confuse the copyrightability of ideas with the copyrightability of an expression." I'm pretty sure I wasn't doing that, but I don't think you read my comment very carefully or followed the link I posted, so I'm going to assume you just misunderstood me. "every court that has seen this sort of case has ruled that a fictional fact or character is considered an expression, not an idea" I interpret Warner Bros. Pictures v. Columbia Broadcasting Sys., 216 F.2d 945 (9th Cir. 1954) to have gone the other way. Do you disagree?