What in the hell are you talking about, knocking teeth out? Why is a current employee, all things equal, "owed" something by management when they underperform r

What in the hell are you talking about, knocking teeth out? Why is a current employee, all things equal, "owed" something by management when they underperform relative to another potential hire, or some standard level of performance? The CEO should be beaten for expecting exceptional performance from his or her employees? Why? Should not satisfying the demands of customers be the goal of most businesses? Does this not dictate that employees meet certain criteria that they are judged against, and if they don't meet these standards while others standby ready to take their place... they are, what entitled to not have to earn their position? Absurd. You have a responsibility to satisfy the terms of the employment contract and in so far as an employees work meets the demands of your customers and the standards you've set in place, it's in your interest to treat them well and reward them for their work. Beyond that, I don't see how violence is necessary when if a worker thinks they are being undervalued, then they could by definition sell their labor to someone else and get compensated fairly.