> You keep making the same tangential point over and over. So the scientific standing of cancer research is "tangential"? Your claim has been that scientists k

> You keep making the same tangential point over and over. So the scientific standing of cancer research is "tangential"? Your claim has been that scientists know that people are sometimes cured of cancer. This is false -- only religious zealots believe that. Scientists know better. > Just because a person gets cancer there's not necessarily any reason to believe they're predisposed to it. Dubious for an individual, true for a population. But I can see there's no point to this -- you don't have the required scientific background or appreciation for statistics.