7 ms·

I'm surprised someone would try to ban such videos. You'd think it more productive to ban the act of "crushing" itself. That someone recorded the act just provi

I'm surprised someone would try to ban such videos. You'd think it more productive to ban the act of "crushing" itself. That someone recorded the act just provides evidence for any appropriate legal action (and vigilante justice too, it seems).

Evbn 14y ago
The argument is that the videos provide economic support for the underlying activity that is harder to police. See also: pornography.
boon 14y ago
I would assume that's covered under existing animal cruelty laws. (not that I'm advocating we ban the speech in this case)