2 ms·
I'm sorry, I shouldn't have said "objectively". But it's not my idea. I'm merely working with definitions provided by wikipedia. If you are aware of better sour
by klibertp 14y ago
I'm sorry, I shouldn't have said "objectively". But it's not my idea. I'm merely working with definitions provided by wikipedia. If you are aware of better source on this matter, please refer me to it.
EDIT: what I mean is that discussing readability is pointless if all the participants have different definitions. I agree that the wikipedia page I linked to does not provide the best possible definition because it talks about texts in natural languages and we're talking about source code. Still, using not-the-best definition is better than using many different definitions.