2 ms·
Hardly, considering its appearance in many programming languages. Although I would argue similarly that, if the ternary operator is terse and cryptic and needs
by FuzzyDunlop 14y ago
Hardly, considering its appearance in many programming languages. Although I would argue similarly that, if the ternary operator is terse and cryptic and needs to be changed to 'if ... then ... else ...'; then '->' and '=>' are equally terse and cryptic and should be kept as 'function'.
It says what it does then, doesn't it?