I'm certainly no enemy of GM foods and I generally find Food Democracy Now to be so, so lame, but I'm going to push back a bit here: > I'm pretty sure the poin

I'm certainly no enemy of GM foods and I generally find Food Democracy Now to be so, so lame, but I'm going to push back a bit here: > I'm pretty sure the point of judges is to uphold the law, not to do what they think is protecting consumer rights or the environment. That's almost the point. There are a bunch of laws that regulate the treatment consumers and the environment which judges are expected to apply in court. The snippet is complaining that judges will, under this act, have limited power to enforce those laws on Monsanto's products were they to be found guilty of breaking them. That's not an unreasonable complaint.