4 ms·
1. isn't Cyprus considered some sort of Tax Haven? 2. this is a terribly non-progressive levy Edit. From: http://www.economist.com/blogs/schumpeter/2013/03/c
by barredo 14y ago
1. isn't Cyprus considered some sort of Tax Haven?
2. this is a terribly non-progressive levy
Edit.
From: http://www.economist.com/blogs/schumpeter/2013/03/cyprus-bail-out http://www.economist.com/blogs/schumpeter/2013/03/cyprus-bai...
> That idea had been in the air for a while, not least because a lot of those uninsured deposits came from outside Cyprus, and from Russia in particular. The politics of saving wealthy Russians with money loaned by thrifty Germans were always going to be tricky.
> What had not been anticipated was a 6.75% loss for savers with deposits in Cypriot banks below the insurance ceiling. Cypriots woke up this morning to find bank branches closed to them. By the time they will be able to get at their money, it will be too late. The offer of equity in banks to replace the value of their savings is meant to be a balm but it’s not a choice they would have made. Why this decision was taken is not yet clear. The most plausible explanation is that the Cypriot government itself preferred to spread the pain rather than wipe out non-resident depositors and jeopardise its long-term prospects as an offshore financial centre for Russian and other money.
Interesting.
- dnu 14y ago3. it proves that it's better to spend spend spend, than to be a sucker and save
- Evbn 14y agoIt is true, though. Money is currency, not a store of value. Buy durable goods or invest in growth projects. Working to accumulate pure money is just piling IOUs on people. If you do that, you are going to face inflation in the future, which you deserve , because your non-spending took away other people's opportunity to create things of value. (Or, if they produced in excess of demand, then prices will drop in the future, and conpensatory inflation is no problem to you.)