4 ms·

Yes and it really showed in the beginning: they had lots of issues and you could constantly see the cat saying "sorry, i am wurkin' on fixin' yer problem" (don'

Yes and it really showed in the beginning: they had lots of issues and you could constantly see the cat saying "sorry, i am wurkin' on fixin' yer problem" (don't remember the exact msg but it was a lolzcat message). SO is also hardly something impressive from a UI point of view: it is a very simple UI really not doing much. Usenet readers from 20 years ago were way more capable than SO...

heartbreak 14y ago
What does IIS have to do with the UI, exactly? It's just a web server.
- pmorici 14y ago
  The site's UI is simple and yet the server still can't handle it perhaps was the implication.
  - ams6110 14y ago
    I'm not seeing a direct connection between UI simplicity and server capability. I can serve a hideously complex UI with a very minimal demand on the server. Demand on the server is much more about actual traffic, not the UI being rendered in the browser.
vyrotek 14y ago
Other sites built with IIS & MVC - http://stackoverflow.com/a/12006474/10941 http://stackoverflow.com/a/12006474/10941 monster.com, break.com, ancestry.com, wildtangent.com, kbb.com, redbox.com , nordstrom.com , townhall.com, tunein.com, g4tv.com Don't blame the framework, blame the developers.