3 ms·

I think the chance of recovering the money is higher than zero, close to 1 in fact. All the casino has to do is store the tape and wait for facial recognition t

I think the chance of recovering the money is higher than zero, close to 1 in fact. All the casino has to do is store the tape and wait for facial recognition technology to take off on the web. In a decade or so we'll just be taping crimes and than the web will tell us which individuals have matching bone structures.

rescripting 14y ago
The title of the article is misleading. He didn't steal it, he cheated the casino out of it. This is an important distinction since in the eyes of the law the casino willingly gave him the money when he cashed out. The casino can catch you cheating and prevent you from cashing out, but once you're out the door you're pretty much free (although I probably wouldn't come back). In fact the article actually says they've identified the man and banned him from the casino. If they had legal backing I'm sure it would have mentioned the manhunt, and not a "near zero chance of recovering the money."
- rtwtlkj 14y ago
  Or they are just making it up and using this as an excuse to never allow him to play in their casinos
  - andyakb 14y ago
    If they want to ban somebody, they don't need to make up a fake story and get it in the news, they just ban them
    - bhickey 14y ago
      Sure, but they need a good story if they want to recover a $33m loss.
rollo_tommasi 14y ago
Given that it's an Australian casino, its highly likely that the gambler is associated with a syndicate working out of Southeast Asia (see for example the recent soccer gambling scandal). The problem isn't identifying who took the money, the problem is a) prosecuting and b) identifying and recovering assets in a tangle of opaque foreign legal systems.