Rather than hacking the video feed, its far more likely remote access to the feed was given to a second accomplice by the casino insider (who later was sacked).

Rather than hacking the video feed, its far more likely remote access to the feed was given to a second accomplice by the casino insider (who later was sacked). This second accomplice then signalled to the gambler by some other method (either physical or electronic). There's a bit more detail here: http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/law-order/crown-casino-hi-tech-scam-nets-32-million/story-fnat79vb-1226597666337 http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/law-order/crown-casino-hi-t...