This supposedly free market anti-labourer rhetoric is absurd: If market participants organise as a company, they seem have every right to negotiate as a whole t

This supposedly free market anti-labourer rhetoric is absurd: If market participants organise as a company, they seem have every right to negotiate as a whole to get a better deal. What is your problem with just another type of market participant organising and negotiating as a group? With the drivers acting as a group, the other party would now have to replace most of them (excluding defectors), not one of them, which is more difficult, giving the group a better negotiating position. No entitlement, just free markets and game theory.