The chart of mass shooting casualties leads me to believe this study has underlying bias already. 1) The use of bullets seems like something a media outlet wou

The chart of mass shooting casualties leads me to believe this study has underlying bias already. 1) The use of bullets seems like something a media outlet would do to invoke irrational emotional response. I'd hope that if this is a serious scientific study you wouldn't have to resort to such antics. 2) The only chart on this page centers on mass shootings which account for less than 1% of all gun violence. I'd much rather see a comprehensive breakdown of gun violence by incident type (gang, mass, accidental, etc.) and also by weapon (semi-auto handgun, revolver, shotgun, semi-auto rifle, etc.). EDIT: It would also be nice to see a citation for the underlying chart data.