3 ms·
I agree. It's really unclear what's going on, actually. We don't know exactly what the FSF is seeing, nor if they did fair tests, nor if they're reporting fai
by jholman 14y ago
I agree.
It's really unclear what's going on, actually.
We don't know exactly what the FSF is seeing, nor if they did fair tests, nor if they're reporting fairly (though I tend to assume so, tentatively).
We don't know if Google did something deliberately, nor who did it. We don't know how it relates to Per's mailling list message, if at all. If there was action, we don't know if it's an experiment, or a bug, or who it affects, or how often.
More generally, it doesn't seem like this is an urgent issue that requires panicking. The world can get along fine for a month without people being able to invite gmail users. But, on the other hand, if the worst case is true, that Google has started blocking invites from ALL other domains, ALL the time, then I think the FSF's political position is sound.
So far, though, this really isn't like Reader.
- jeza 14y agoSure the world may get by, but federated IM should be the future of online communications, possibly even more so than email. People love to chat online, SMS, iMessage, etc. But these systems shouldn't be so fragmented into isolated little islands. Apple's iMessage shouldn't even exist and should just redirect people to an XMPP service, while SMS should just be seen as a legacy.
- jholman 14y agoI agree, which is why I said "If <blah blah blah>, then I think the FSF's political position is sound."