"When I asked for a point of comparison, he said Detroit was 4%." The stats on Detroit emergency responders are utterly embarrassing. You pretty much can't cou

"When I asked for a point of comparison, he said Detroit was 4%." The stats on Detroit emergency responders are utterly embarrassing. You pretty much can't count on police, fire or EMT even if you had a gunshot wound in a burning house and the shooter was still there. So I'm guessing the issue in Detroit is less about technique and more about no access to trained responders. *And to be clear, I'm not blaming the emergency responders in Detroit for the problem. The city is huge and spread out so it takes a long time to get to the scene, there's no funding for additional outposts or training, and the jobs are dangerous making them unattractive to people with other options, and there's a higher than average amount of serious crime and emergencies.