7 ms·
He's asking for specific elements of the reader that people found useful, enjoyable, easy to use. I'd say that's valuable. How is it not?
by jcomis 14y ago
He's asking for specific elements of the reader that people found useful, enjoyable, easy to use. I'd say that's valuable. How is it not?
- nicksergeant 14y agoSo like, the "Subscribe" button, and the list view? That's what was useful. I really don't get what he's aiming for here... obscure features that may have existed that only some people thought were useful?
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- Semaphor 14y agoWeirdly enough, none of the readers I tested can replicate that. Qbix (list-view takes too much space, not available in "show all") and The Old Reader (no equal indent blog name -> post title in all view, shows no text snippets in list view) come closest. Especially TOR looks like a great replacement but it's still pretty overloaded. > There are 25746 users in the import queue ahead of you. And it has no "Export" as of right now. edit: Formatting
- Semaphor 14y agoOkay, why did I write Qbix? What I meant was bazqux [1] and I just got a mail that list view in all is now available and they are thinking about offering a more condensed view :) [1] http://bazqux.com/ http://bazqux.com/
- MatthewPhillips 14y agoNo, I agree, I just hope he doesn't hear "I liked that the list of feeds is on the left" and think that's the takeaway. Not that, you know, it's an RSS reader that people had gotten used to.
- zoowar 14y agoWhy doesn't he just ask the google reader staff?
- b0sk 14y agoWall of text from sources I have subscribed. When I press 'f' it embiggens that text to cover the whole screen. j/k for navigation. If he had spent a couple of minutes on Google Reader he'd know.