4 ms·

Anyone got a nice summary? Do you think this should be patentable?

• aredington 14y ago
  I think there's a nice case of posterior-prior art.
• Retric 14y ago
  It's a parody, with the author providing prior art vs. the patent in question.
  • jnazario 14y ago
    s/parity/parody/ perhaps?
• cstross 14y ago
  What do you think should be patentable -- the practice of being extremely sarcastic about IBM filing a patent on something that someone else invented and published a few years earlier? Or multi-pipes?