4 ms·

A nice alternative is Zurb Joyride: http://www.zurb.com/playground/jquery-joyride-feature-tour-plugin http://www.zurb.com/playground/jquery-joyride-feature-tour

• afshinmeh 14y ago
  Yeah but it works with jQuery. What if I don't want to add jQuery to my page? IntroJs built with pure JavaScript.
  • ineedtosleep 14y ago
    Sure, if you don't want to have jQuery as a dependency intro.js is probably the winner. However, do note that Foundation's javascript plugins also work with Zepto[1][2] which weighs in at under 10k gzipped. [1] http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/javascript.html http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/javascript.html [2] http://zeptojs.com/ http://zeptojs.com/
• xpose2000 14y ago
  I was about to post this link myself. I'm not quite sure which one is better. I tend to like the Intro.js page fade animation. Although JoyRide 2 actually scrolls to the highlighted object, whereas intro.js does not.
• mos2 14y ago
  I think the work done here is fansastic and presents a great alternative to the zurb joyride / jquery or zepto combination. I agree with some of the other comments about the usability on an ipad and mobile device as well as scrolling the screen to the focused element. I think larger targets would really help with this. At this point in its development, if you are able to use jQuery or Zepto I think that Joyride 2 offers a much better UI / UX especially if you are planning to use Foundation 3/4.
  • afshinmeh 14y ago
    I'm also agree with you about the size of `next` and `skip` button. I'll fix it asap.