> What's the point of replacing copper if the weakest link of the network remains. Typical selfish attitude. What clearly you don't understand is that for a l

> What's the point of replacing copper if the weakest link of the network remains. Typical selfish attitude. What clearly you don't understand is that for a large percentage of the population the weakest link IS the copper network. They don't connect at 24Mbps. I personally know people who connect as low as 1Mbps. So what good is a faster international link to them ? And there are huge benefits internally if everyone has a super fast connection especially for anything that involves face to face communication e.g. those in remote, rural areas.