3 ms·
No-one claimed that. And as pointed out elsewhere, an update to the sites' CSS is imminent; the copying of SO's CSS seems to have been a simple matter of expedi
by sho 18y ago
No-one claimed that. And as pointed out elsewhere, an update to the sites' CSS is imminent; the copying of SO's CSS seems to have been a simple matter of expediency.
I'm not sure what your point is, actually. Cloning successful products is hardly new or even frowned upon. Indeed, the computer you are using is most likely a descendant of a cloned IBM PC. Why argue?
- chiffonade 18y agoWhy are you wasting your energy? The person you are arguing simply does not like China/Chinese people and will go to any length to trash it/them. Anyone with half a brain can tell this is a perfectly legitimate use of an open/shared source platform, with attribution, reciprocal openness, and local modifications. StackOverflow simply would not have ever made a Chinese version, so some Chinese people took it upon themselves to do it themselves.