> So you're saying that we should either be willing to pay $5/m for an RSS reader service, or $5/m to host the service ourselves? Why is that so unreasonable?

> So you're saying that we should either be willing to pay $5/m for an RSS reader service, or $5/m to host the service ourselves? Why is that so unreasonable? Though, I think it's likely that the hosted solution would be much cheaper than self-hosting, since you don't need to rent one server per user, a hosted solution could be much more efficient.