"They’re all instances of refusing to make things worse for your users in order to make more money." <-- factual statement However, 'evil' is not defined in co

"They’re all instances of refusing to make things worse for your users in order to make more money." <-- factual statement However, 'evil' is not defined in context: https://www.google.com/about/company/philosophy/ https://www.google.com/about/company/philosophy/ Therefore, the leap "evil = make things worse for your users" is not from a google source. That's Aaron's attempt to construct a categorical rule from the examples. "Google unambiguously break their own definition of 'evil'." <-- False, since google didn't explicitly define evil. They broke what Aaron believed google meant when they said "evil".