3 ms·

So you're saying that we should either be willing to pay $5/m for an RSS reader service, or $5/m to host the service ourselves? Someone with a lot of feeds wou

by simonlc 14y ago

So you're saying that we should either be willing to pay $5/m for an RSS reader service, or $5/m to host the service ourselves? Someone with a lot of feeds wouldn't be able to fit all of them in the 5 MB that DOM Storage allows. I wouldn't like an offline feed since a big majority of my feeds are videos and podcasts. As for them being able to yank away at any time, you're right, but there's going to be enough new stuff out there that it wont be a problem, this time we wont have a monopoly.

daave 14y ago
> So you're saying that we should either be willing to pay $5/m for an RSS reader service, or $5/m to host the service ourselves? Why is that so unreasonable? Though, I think it's likely that the hosted solution would be much cheaper than self-hosting, since you don't need to rent one server per user, a hosted solution could be much more efficient.