3 ms·
I don't think you need to use VMWare. I understood from the article that you can upgrade to 1.1 and continue to use VirtualBox as the provider with basically no
by dahjelle 14y ago
I don't think you need to use VMWare. I understood from the article that you can upgrade to 1.1 and continue to use VirtualBox as the provider with basically no hiccups.
- lox 14y agoYeah, I must admit I was confused by this as well. Do we need Fusion + a license for the Vagrant VMWare provider, or is the Vagrant VMWare provider stand-alone?
- Argorak 14y agoYou need both, thats why its a steep price.
- Xylakant 14y agoCertainly I can continue to use Virtualbox. However, VMWare is more efficient and more stable - virtualbox is a bit slow and tends to crash your mac once in a while. I'd be willing to shell out some money for that feature, but given the price I probably won't, at least not in the near future.