4 ms·

In the right bottom corner there is a CC-wiki logo with link to creativecommons.org

• sjs382 18y ago
  Which fulfills the "Share Alike" portion, but not the "Attribution" portion...
  • jhancock 18y ago
    http://code.google.com/p/cnprog/ http://code.google.com/p/cnprog/ shows attribution. Maybe the boys at StackOverflow will need to talk to the writer of this new project to firm up details on how and where he shows such attributions.
    • sjs382 18y ago
      You think that's adequate? Personally I don't, but it's not an issue I care enough to argue. It was just an observation.
      • jhancock 18y ago
        What I have seen so far: * 4 prominent attributions: SO attributions on his blog, the google code main page, CC license on the new production site, and in the code itself!!! * apache open source license Maybe he is not in full compliance yet, but this is one hell of a good start and demonstrates good faith.
        • sjs382 18y ago
          I agree that the project is done in good faith and is a completely worthwhile project. See my original comment that started this thread. I think the proper way of attribution would be a link (or message) in the footer or, at the very least, on the about page. Maybe I'm being pedantic, but if I need to search for the attribution by going to the developers blog or viewing the source code, I don't think that's enough. This is beside the point, because I agree that the other forms /are/ attribution, but I don't consider the creative commons link a form of attribution at all.