3 ms·
This kind of free-floating opinion, unsupported by evidence or even details, is worse than useless. It's a waste of time masquerading as content. What is the b
by pekk 14y ago
This kind of free-floating opinion, unsupported by evidence or even details, is worse than useless. It's a waste of time masquerading as content.
What is the basis for your claim? That it's impossible to build large projects without static typing, or what?
- pjmlp 14y agoBased on my experience yes. I work in enterprise projects done in multi-site context context, usually with teams that encompass more than 30 developers with multiple levels of experience. Depending on the customer, sometimes it is very hard to force developers to write unit tests. If the customer does not care about them, the product manager will not enforce them. Additionally given the lack of experiences of the junior developers, always chosen because they are cheaper to the customer, unit tests tend to be badly written. So with static typing one has at least a guarantee that the product compiles and might eventually even run. With dynamic typing and lack of tests, you can spend days getting the product back into a runnable state.