4 ms·
>but would detract from their focus. Why not just stop the development on it and let the service to continue? I never had any problems with Google Reader, nor
by rkwz 14y ago
>but would detract from their focus.
Why not just stop the development on it and let the service to continue?
I never had any problems with Google Reader, nor do I want a particular feature to be added to it. It's fine as it is.
- VikingCoder 14y agoIt's fine as it is? It's fine, as long as it crawls every feed, merges the contents, archives them, serves up the bandwidth, allows people to write custom front-ends that prohibit Google from even showing you any extra data like say an ad?
- larsberg 14y agoAs opposed to gmail, which I visited in a browser (with AdBlock) once, to set up two-phase auth during that loud security push?
- bradleyland 14y agoRemember the recent Google Reader outage? There's no such thing as a zero-touch web service. There's always some resource commitment, and sometimes running a successful business means making the hard decisions, like shutting down services that are used, but don't generate revenue, and don't contribute to your core business.