4 ms·
>as long as the majority of the network is running software that plays by the same rules, this kind of thing isn't possible Isn't this against the idea of dece
by runn1ng 14y ago
>as long as the majority of the network is running software that plays by the same rules, this kind of thing isn't possible
Isn't this against the idea of decentralization?
- Shish2k 14y agoHTTP is decentralised
- davidw 14y agoAnything of value on the end of an HTTP transaction has some centralization, such as bank accounts, Amazon.com, or other things that involve real money.
- mcherm 14y agoNot at all, rather it is the key that makes decentralization possible. The reason bitcoin can be decentralized is that ultimate authority comes, not from a central server, but from a consensus among the community of bitcoin processors and miners. The cryptography just enforces the consensus. In other words, ANYONE could write their own blockchain... even one that showed everyone else in the world giving all their money that person. It's just that no one would pay any attention to that blockchain... we'd all be working off the consensus view. This is also why bitcoin is resistant to being controlled by "the authorities", but not immune to it. If someone controlled over 50% of the compute power that's doing mining and processing payments, they could change the system and "fix" the numbers. The fact that it is decentralized is a defense against this because (hopefully) no one entity controls a significant portion of the compute power.