3 ms·
The boxers hands bit is not true, they aren't required to be registered nor are they consider weapons. However, a fighter or martial artists background may be p
by coryl 14y ago
The boxers hands bit is not true, they aren't required to be registered nor are they consider weapons. However, a fighter or martial artists background may be pertinent in the case.
- talmand 14y agoI've seen many cases where there was a violent altercation of some kind where the person with training is labeled the responsible party even if they were the victim. I forget where it was, but years ago when I was in martial arts a case made the rounds in our group about a guy who was attacked, I forget why, in front of multiple witnesses at the local mall during a demonstration. In the tussle the attacker fell and hit his head on the nearby fountain, I believed he died. The prosecution focused on the victim's martial arts training implying that he had total control of the situation and that the result was his sole responsibility. It's a sobering thought to think that your local prosecutor might imply your teenage child is a highly trained killer because they participated in Tae Kwon Do.