3 ms·
Maybe to prove his point ? Because I tried with ruby 1.9.3p327 (2012-11-10 revision 37606) [x86_64-darwin11.4.2] and the result is more real 0m2.835s user 0m2
by byroot 14y ago
Maybe to prove his point ?
Because I tried with ruby 1.9.3p327 (2012-11-10 revision 37606) [x86_64-darwin11.4.2] and the result is more
real 0m2.835s
user 0m2.236s
sys 0m0.449s
(of course the computer and the system are different but still)
This benchmark is totally stupid.
- gnufied 14y agoI was waiting like a kid at the candy bar, which version of Ruby the OP used and then Rubinius. WTF. Wondering what happened to collective HN hivemind to upvote a post like this.