3 ms·
Nice how the test is performed on a release candidate version of Rubinius instead of a MRI release such as 1.9.3 or 2.0.0. This is quite a contrived test. Test
by trebor 14y ago
Nice how the test is performed on a release candidate version of Rubinius instead of a MRI release such as 1.9.3 or 2.0.0. This is quite a contrived test. Test it against MRI 1.9.3 and 2.0.0 and I'll consider it more accurate.
- jazzyb 14y agoI ran this against MRI on my MacBook Pro (ruby 1.8.7 (2012-02-08 patchlevel 358) [universal-darwin12.0]) and got: real 0m0.429s user 0m0.215s sys 0m0.145s As a comparison, for Java (java version "1.6.0_43") I got: real 0m18.856s user 0m20.529s sys 0m3.093s