For me, it was "statistically significant" that lowered their credibility: Oh yeah? under what p-value? The data is hard enough to analyse, we don't need misle

For me, it was "statistically significant" that lowered their credibility: Oh yeah? under what p-value? The data is hard enough to analyse, we don't need misleading statistics on top of that. (To clarify my point: "statistical significance" is indicative of frequentist statistics. While the changes in the frequency properties of sales prior to and after the shutdown are relevant information, they are probably not the best way to use available information.)