4 ms·
This was on Ruby 1.9, 2010 era. No patches. Memory was definitely a concern and probably contributed to some of it. Just to note though, after a machine was tak
by treeder 14y ago
This was on Ruby 1.9, 2010 era. No patches. Memory was definitely a concern and probably contributed to some of it. Just to note though, after a machine was taken offline by the load balancer, it would generally come back to life.
- TresAmiga 14y agoMemory "probably contributed to it"? You don't even know why the old version was slow but you want to credit golang with making it fast? Hype much? The lack of critical thinking here on Hacker News is astounding.