4 ms·
This looks like an excellent step in the right direction, but I do have one worry here: native apps. The New York Times has had several experiments over the la
by voxmatt 14y ago
This looks like an excellent step in the right direction, but I do have one worry here: native apps.
The New York Times has had several experiments over the last year that indicate a desire to move everyone on to the web and out of native apps. They had an experimental website aimed at tablets that they marketed to NYTimes iPad app users and, while nice, it was a definite step down from a native app. And the iPad app has been increasingly sluggish, despite occasional updates — seemingly a sign of disrepair.
I design and program for the web, so I definitely understand the allure, but mobile web apps are, at best, an approximation of the experience provided by mobile native apps. Just ask 37 Signals, arguably one of the biggest proponents of web apps. Maybe mobile web apps will catch up, but we're not there yet, and I would strongly argue that we won't be there very soon.
I have an inkling that this redesign will be accompanied by a renewed push away from native apps. I just hope that The New York Times doesn't stop development of their native apps.
- ChrisLTD 14y agoAs tablet and phone hardware matures, they should get faster processing power and additional memory that will make these web apps Good Enough (tm). Until that time, like you, I hope the NY Times and others keep making native apps.
- tannerc 14y agoThat's what they said about running Flash.
- ChrisLTD 14y agoGood Flash performance on mobile required both better hardware and efficiently programmed software from Adobe. Adobe is seems to have been a pretty big bottleneck. Flash still works pretty poorly on my desktops and laptops with gobs more power than my phones and tablets. However, in the case of web apps, we're almost there on performance and we have Google, Apple, Mozilla and Microsoft all working to improve mobile browsers and browser speed.