The section the GP quoted was not the entire article. Rogers went on to end the quoted paragraph with the rhetorical question "We don't want Weston, but maybe w

The section the GP quoted was not the entire article. Rogers went on to end the quoted paragraph with the rhetorical question "We don't want Weston, but maybe we want Wayland?", and went on to address that question in the rest of the article. Whether or not you agree with the chain of reasoning, pretending he never wrote anything other than a single step in it, and calling that a "strawman" on the grounds that it isn't a whole chain, is a little silly.