3 ms·
I wouldn't say it was needless. As far as I'm concerned, it is the KDE and Wayland guys who have come out screaming in a very public, very vitriolic attack agai
by da_n 14y ago
I wouldn't say it was needless. As far as I'm concerned, it is the KDE and Wayland guys who have come out screaming in a very public, very vitriolic attack against Ubuntu. No matter what side of the argument you stand on, you can't deny that they have been taking a shit on the Ubuntu brand (although a lot of the worst comments have been deleted it appears). It is no wonder Mark is reacting in a caustic manner in my opinion.
- drivebyacct2 14y agoI sympathize with them. I'm still seeing mistruths about Wayland all over the Internet as a result of that highly inaccurate (at least initially, they've editted it) MirSpec document.
- tjdetwiler 14y agoPersonally I have higher standards for professionalism for someone in Mark's position vs the KDE/Wayland guys.
- burntsushi 14y ago> it is the KDE and Wayland guys who have come out screaming in a very public, very vitriolic attack against Ubuntu When blatantly false things are stated about your project by an organization as big as Canonical, one really can't blame them for expressing frustration. Especially when there is FUD about Wayland everywhere you go.