4 ms·
While I am all for internet enabled disruption, what about the local laws that Uber and other IP/Mobile-web services do not follow? Private sedan services are
by zero_intp 14y ago
While I am all for internet enabled disruption, what about the local laws that Uber and other IP/Mobile-web services do not follow?
Private sedan services are still limited by the local cities regulations, and this is not a bad thing. Localities deserve the rights to regulate themselves.
Where we obviously get into mud, is where the local commercial establishment thinks it's income is a prerogative of participating.
Local regulations worth adhering to, that do not break contract law:
What about maximum fares?
What about legislated accuracy of meter/GPS for billing?
What about posted signs for reasonable health precautions,
like smoking?
like the local licensing board for complaints
(oh wait you don't have licenses....)
Not that I am establishmentarian, but it is completely unreasonable for a market disrupting services to NOT follow local regulations for said given commercial activity.
That being said, one does not have to be a big business to be able to give a random a ride. However, cabs of today are shaped and outfitted with specific hardware for obvious reasons.
- dpatru 14y agoThe purpose of government is to preserve liberty. For example, government should protect citizens from mafia-style extortion where people are forced to pay protection money in order to practice a certain occupation. But when government becomes the mafia, when it extorts money from people in who want to practice an occupation, as it does with taxi services in boston, then government is acting illegitimately.
- intended 14y agoThis isn't an answer to the question though, if anything its a gross over simplification of the role of government. Incidentally, iirc the mafia used to be interested in cab companies, since it gave them access to controlling unions and a lucrative cash based economic niche.